This site publishes one thing: a comparison of online casinos that accept Interac from a Canadian bank account, with the welcome offer reproduced as each operator publishes it. It is not an operator, it accepts no deposits and it runs no games.
The editorial focus is deliberately narrow. This is a payments page rather than a games page: what it tries to explain well is how money gets in, how it gets back out, and which party in the chain is responsible when either goes wrong.
The order reflects the welcome offer, the clarity of its published terms, and whether Interac appears on the withdrawal side as well as the deposit side. The five criteria are set out in full on the main page.
Offers are reproduced from the operator's own published terms and dated to the month they were checked. Where a label had to be shortened to fit the table, the figure and any prize attached to it are preserved - a shortened label never drops the thing being offered.
No star ratings and no scores. A numeric rating on a payments comparison implies a measurement, and the honest signals here are the published terms and the structure of the payment chain.
No claimed withdrawal timings. Interac timing depends on your bank, on the processor in the middle and on the operator's internal review queue, and a single figure on a comparison page cannot represent that honestly. Where this site has no source for a number, it says so rather than estimating.
Some links to operators are commercial: if a reader opens an account through one, the editorial team may be paid a commission. Those links are marked as sponsored in the page's own markup.
Payment does not buy a position. The order does not change for an operator that pays more, and no operator sees the text about it before publication.